Peer reviewed scientific journals

82 visitors think this article is helpful. 82 votes in total.

Peer Review Debate Nature

Peer reviewed scientific journals

Nature's peer review debate. Peer review is commonly accepted as an essential part of scientific publication. But the ways peer review is put into practice vary across journals and disciplines. What is the best method of peer review? Is it truly a value-adding process? What are the ethical concerns? And how can new. Reporters are encouraged to develop stories based on scientific papers published in the American Association of Cancer Research's (AACR) eight peer-reviewed journals. The AACR Communications and Public Relations Department distributes press releases about newsworthy journal articles. Reporters may also write about other research published in the journals, so long as listed embargoes are followed.

Next

PDF

Peer reviewed scientific journals

The publishing delay in scholarly peer‐reviewed journals Bo‐Christer Björk Professor, Information Systems Science Hanken School of Economics "A tour de force list of scientific papers..." - Robert M. Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW) or Dangerous Anthropogenic Global Warming (DAGW)]. Environmental Scientist "Wow, the list is pretty impressive ... General Antarctica Arctic Climate Sensitivity Clouds Coral Reefs Deaths Disease Ecological Glaciers Greenland Gulf Stream Hockey Stick Medieval Warm Period Roman Warm Period Ocean Acidification Permafrost Polar Bears Sea Level Species Extinctions Preface: The following papers support skeptic arguments against Anthropogenic Climate Change (ACC), Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) or Alarmism [e.g. Pilkey Global Climate Change (Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Volume 113, Issue 3, pp. 105-121, January 2009)- Tom Quirk Earth's Temperature / CO2 Equilibrium Prior to 1850 (Energy & Environment, Volume 20, Number 1-2, pp. Cropp Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics (PDF) (International Journal of Modern Physics B, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp. Tscheuschner * Reply to "Comment on 'Falsification Of The Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within The Frame Of Physics' by Joshua B. Theoretical Physicist "I really appreciate your important effort in compiling the list." - Willie Soon, Ph. Astrophysicist and Geoscientist "An excellent place to start to take stock of the scientific diversity of positions on AGW." - Emil A. Thanks to the pop tech team." - Joanne Nova, Author of The Skeptics Handbook "I do confess a degree of fascination with Poptech's list..." - John Cook, Cartoonist at Skeptical Science † This resource has been cited over 100 times, including in scholarly peer-reviewed journals. Sorokhtin The Spatial Pattern and Mechanisms of Heat-Content Change in the North Atlantic (PDF) (Science, Volume 319, Number 5864, pp. 470-479, March 2008)- Linda Pilkey-Jarvis, Orrin H. 87-98, July 2008)- John Stubbles Human population and carbon dioxide (Energy Policy, Volume 36, Issue 7, pp. Schaffer On the credibility of climate predictions (PDF) (Hydrological Sciences Journal, Volume 53, Number 4, pp. 101-104, January 2009)- Craig Loehle Sources and Sinks of Carbon Dioxide (PDF) (Energy & Environment, Volume 20, Number 1-2, pp. Senior Research Scientist "...it's a very useful resource. 281-286, March 2008)- Klaus-Martin Schulte Evidence for "publication Bias" Concerning Global Warming in Science and Nature (Energy & Environment, Volume 19, Number 2, pp. Michaels Useless Arithmetic: Ten Points to Ponder When Using Mathematical Models in Environmental Decision Making (PDF) (Public Administration Review, Volume 68, Issue 3, pp. An Alternative View of Climate Change for Steelmakers (PDF) (Iron & Steel Technology, Volume 5, Number 7, pp. (PDF) (Economic Analysis and Policy, Volume 38, Issue 2, pp. 995-1011, December 2008)- Fred Goldberg Computer Study of Cluster Mechanism of Anti-greenhouse Effect (International Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, Volume 1, Number 1, pp. Galashev Climate Change and the Earth's Magnetic Poles, A Possible Connection (PDF) (Energy & Environment, Volume 20, Number 1-2, pp. Kerton Cooling of the Global Ocean Since 2003 (PDF) (Energy & Environment, Volume 20, Number 1-2, pp. Smith, Jorg Zimmermann" (PDF) (International Journal of Modern Physics B, Volume 24, Issue 10, pp. Tscheuschner Global warming and carbon dioxide through sciences (PDF) (Environment International, Volume 35, Issue 2, pp. Florides, Paul Christodoulides Oceanic influences on recent continental warming (PDF) (Climate Dynamics, Volume 32, Issue 2-3, pp. Please read the following introductory notes for more detailed information. Scott Armstrong Limits on climate sensitivity derived from recent satellite and surface observations (PDF) (Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 112, Issue D24, December 2007)- Petr Chylek et al. Disclaimer: Even though the most prolific authors on the list are skeptics, the inclusion of a paper in this list does not imply a specific personal position to any of the authors. Fred Singer * An updated comparison of model ensemble and observed temperature trends in the tropical troposphere (PDF) (Submitted to the International Journal of Climatology, 2009)- Stephen Mc Intyre, Ross Mc Kitrick Global Warming: Forecasts by Scientists Versus Scientific Forecasts (PDF) (Energy & Environment, Volume 18, Number 7-8, pp. Quantifying the influence of anthropogenic surface processes and inhomogeneities on gridded global climate data (PDF) (Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 112, Issue D24, December 2007)- Ross R. Michaels Taking Green House Warming Seriously (PDF) (Energy & Environment, Volume 18, Number 7-8, pp. Lindzen The Fraud Allegation Against Some Climatic Research of Wei-Chyung Wang (PDF) (Energy & Environment, Volume 18, Number 7-8, pp. Keenan Temporal Variability in Local Air Temperature Series Shows Negative Feedback (PDF) (Energy & Environment, Volume 18, Number 7-8, pp. While certain authors on the list cannot be labeled skeptics (e.g. 1059-1072, December 2007)- Olavi Karner Cooling of Atmosphere Due to CO2 Emission (PDF) (Energy Sources, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp. Harold Brooks, Roger Pielke Jr., Roger Pielke Sr.) their paper(s) or results from their paper(s) can still support skeptic's arguments against Alarmism. Fred Singer * Addendum to A comparison of tropical temperature trends with model Predictions (PDF) (Submitted to the International Journal of Climatology, 2007)- David H.

Next

Peer review, preprints and the speed of science - The Guardian

Peer reviewed scientific journals

Sep 7, 2015. A few weeks ago my collaborators and I submitted our latest paper to a scientific journal. We have been investigating how noroviruses subvert the molecular machinery of infected cells and have some interesting results. If it passes peer review, our paper could be published in three or four months' time. SCIENCE advances fastest when data and conclusions are shared as quickly as possible. Yet it is common practice for medical researchers to hoard results for months or years until research is published in an academic journal. Even then, the data underpinning a study are often not made public.

Next

Free Access to Scientific Journals

Peer reviewed scientific journals

OMICS International publishes 700 online Peer-reviewed open access scholarly science journals in the field of medical engineering technology and. Open Access Initiative is committed to make genuine and reliable contributions to the scientific community without restricting the access of published content. This publisher hosts over 700 leading-edge peer reviewed Open Access Journals and organizes over 3000 International Conferences all over the world. Obtained enormous global visibility and tremendous response from the authors and readers from all over the world inspired the publisher to maintain reputed Open Access Journals in various scientific disciplines. The journals have over 15 million readers and the reputation and success earned can be attributed to the strong Editorial Board which contains over 50,000 eminent personalities that ensure a rapid, qualitative and quick review process. More than 1000 International Societies are supporting in making scientific information Open Access. International Conferences are rendering perfect platform for global networking for the renowned speakers and scientists across the globe through a most exciting and memorable scientific event filled with much enlightening interactive sessions, world class exhibitions and poster presentations. Open Access journals are the major source of knowledge for young and aspiring generations who are keen in pursuing a career in sciences. This system provides easy access to networks of scientific journals.

Next

How to recognize peer-reviewed journals

Peer reviewed scientific journals

Science Journals. AAAS publishes six respected peer-reviewed journals. Science, the premier global science weekly; Science Signaling, the leading journal of cell signaling and regulatory biology; Science Translational Medicine, integrating medicine, engineering and science to promote human health; Science Advances. The idea behind peer review is simple: It's supposed to weed out bad science. Peer reviewers read over promising studies that have been submitted to a journal to help gauge whether they should be published or need changes. Ideally, reviewers are experts in fields related to the studies in question. They add helpful comments, point out problems and holes, or simply reject flawed papers that shouldn't see the light of day. The two researchers, wanted to test how reliable and unbiased this process actually is. To do this, they selected 12 papers that had been published about two to three years earlier in extremely selective American psychology journals. The researchers then altered the names and university affiliations on the journal manuscripts and resubmitted the papers to the same journal. In theory, these papers should have been high quality — they'd already made it into these prestigious publications.

Next

Science Is Suffering Because of Peer Review’s Big Problems | The New Republic

Peer reviewed scientific journals

Aug 9, 2016. That is, the work would deserve publication in a scientific journal. But, prior to publication, any investigation must pass the screening of the “peer review.” This is a critical part of the process—only after peer review can a work be considered part of the scientific literature. And only peer-reviewed work will be. Scientific Journals are multidimensional Open Access gateways for the exploration of scientific discoveries and new research in the medical and other Scientifics. Scientific Journals represent the collaborative efforts of many scientists and scholars from various disciplines. Science literatures have evolved from time to time in terms of specialization and target audience. Reports of new research findings are important to fuel novel assumptions and discoveries that can only be in existence through the publication of Science journals. Although some Science Journals are multidisciplinary, most journals are highly specialized and they publish articles related to specific scientific fields.

Next

PLOS Public Library of Science

Peer reviewed scientific journals

Dive into More PLOS Content. 160,000+ peer-reviewed articles are free to access, reuse and redistribute. Anytime, Anywhere. PLOS ONE; PLOS Biology; PLOS Medicine; PLOS Computational Biology; PLOS Genetics; PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases; PLOS Pathogens · breaking research, video highlights and author. University of Pretoria provides funding as a partner of The Conversation AFRICA. The Conversation UK receives funding from Hefce, Hefcw, SAGE, SFC, RCUK, The Nuffield Foundation, The Ogden Trust, The Royal Society, The Wellcome Trust, Esmée Fairbairn Foundation and The Alliance for Useful Evidence, as well as sixty five university members. View the full list Democracy and scientific peer review have something in common: it’s a “system full of problems but the least worst we have”. That’s the view of Richard Smith, a medical doctor and former editor of the illustrious British Medical Journal. Wiley, a large academic publishing house, says that: Peer review is designed to assess the validity, quality and often the originality of articles for publication. Its ultimate purpose is to maintain the integrity of science by filtering out invalid or poor quality articles. Another publishing house, Springer, describes peer reviewers as being “almost like intellectual gatekeepers to the journal as they provide an objective assessment of a paper and determine if it is useful enough to be published”. The peer review system has received a fair amount of negative press in recent years.

Next

List of scientific journals - Wikipedia

Peer reviewed scientific journals

The following is a partial list of scientific journals. There are thousands of scientific journals in publication, and many more have been published at various points in the past. The list given here is far from exhaustive, only containing some of the most influential, currently publishing journals in each field. As a rule of thumb. In many cases professors will require that students utilize articles from “peer-reviewed” journals. Sometimes the phrases “refereed journals” or “scholarly journals” are used to describe the same type of journals. But what are peer-reviewed (or refereed or scholarly) journal articles, and why do faculty require their use? Three categories of information resources: information in a peer-reviewed journal is actually refereed, or reviewed. For example, editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and other types of information don’t count as articles, and may not be accepted by your professor. How do you determine whether an article qualifies as being a peer-reviewed journal article? First, you need to be able to identify which journals are peer-reviewed.

Next

Definition of peer-reviewed scientific journal - NCI Dictionary of.

Peer reviewed scientific journals

A publication that contains original articles that have been written by scientists and evaluated for technical and scientific quality and correctness by other experts in the same field. Generally speaking, SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN presents ideas that have already been published in the peer-reviewed technical literature. We do not publish new theories or results of original research. Please allow six to eight weeks for the review process. From this and other submission instructions on that page I conclude that the manuscripts undergo a general review that is probably aimed at accuracy and style, which is different than typical scientific peer-review of original research. No scientific peer-review is mentioned in the relevant page on the Popular Science website either. Neither journal is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, both are popular science journals. So (1) they don't publish original research and (2) the aim of the review process is completely different. In particular, reviewing is done to ensure that the article is suitable for the scientifically minded public, i.e.

Next

Rethinking Peer Review - The New Atlantis

Peer reviewed scientific journals

The most interesting change stirring in the world of science and medical journals — and the change likely to have the most far-reaching impact — relates to peer review. Also known as “refereeing,” the peer review process is used by journal editors to aid in deciding which papers are worth publishing. Some researchers. The following is a partial list of scientific journals. There are thousands of scientific journals in publication, and many more have been published at various points in the past. The list given here is far from exhaustive, only containing some of the most influential, currently publishing journals in each field. As a rule of thumb, each field should be represented by more or less than ten positions, chosen by their impact factors and other ratings. Note: there are many science magazines that are not scientific journals, including Scientific American, New Scientist, Australasian Science and others. For periodicals in the social sciences and humanities, see list of social science journals.

Next