After 2 hours of work, i've come to the conclusion.i should do the other essay question for my history exam #fml. bravery short essay length lalla. Debates on justice policy often reflect fundamental disagreements about the extent to which either the rights guaranteed in the U. Constitution or the crime-fighting mission of our justice agencies should be emphasized. Dempsey is a critical account of our increasing willingness to trade civil rights for an enhanced sense of security, a trade that the authors argue will ultimately leave us both unsafe and unsatisfied. Out of this concern for an approach that balances civil liberties and the practical requirements of law enforcement come such well-known legal innovations as the public safety exception to the exclusionary rule, the “plain-view” search, and the “Terry” stop. For some, striking the right balance between civil rights and effective crime control may seem to be more a matter of limiting rights and empowering law enforcement. At the same time, it is widely recognized that law enforcement agencies, which operate in a world that is often both complicated and very dangerous, must confront threats that can seem more immediate and more consequential than those associated with abstractions like restricted civil rights. In general, and particularly in the academic world, the American system’s historic emphasis on civil liberties, the presumption of innocence, and our traditional respect for the rights of the accused have been regarded as essential features of our democratic society. Those who follow criminal justice issues are well-aware that debates on justice policy often reflect fundamental disagreements about the extent to which we should emphasize either the rights guaranteed in the U. Constitution or the crime-fighting mission of some of our justice agencies.
May 17, 2013. If you like what you read and want a 100% original, custom essay sample on terrorism or any other specific topic, feel free to give us a call today. The press terrorists receive from heightened security along with the increased inconvenience and costs has helped keep terrorism fresh in the American. Congratulations to actor Stanley Tucci and his wife, literary agent Felicity Blunt — the couple are expecting their second child together! The couple shared their baby news at the screening of Final Portrait in New York last week, with Felicity showing off a sizeable baby bump. [Read more...]Congratulations to Michael Bublé and his wife, actress and model Luisana Lopilato, who are expecting their third child together. The singer announced the happy baby news at the Juno Awards in Vancouver, telling the audience during his monologue: “You have filled me up with joy and love and luck. [Read more...]Congratulations to actor Eddie Redmayne and his wife, Hannah…
Entering the new millennium, humanity came face to face with the most dangerous global challenge of terrorism. With each. and in any society. The study of this highly negative social and political phenomenon and its historical development is the key to creating ways and methods to combat, control and prevent terrorism. According to Kolar (2005), democracy means the government of the people. The term is commonly defined in America to include three aspects. It must be the government of the people, formed by the people themselves and to serve the people’s interest. This means that any democratic government must be that which is formed by the people who continue to exercise it with the aim of serving the interest of the citizens. Ebert (2008) noted that any state that is considered to be democratic must have certain key principles. These include but are not limited only to fundamental freedom and fundamental rights for its people, regular elections and the rule of law, a clear separation of power between different arms of government, provision for parliament and its relationship with the government. Other principles include: the democratic pluralism, well established government and the opposition, respect for public opinion and the freedom of the media, decentralization of power and resources, democratic governance and finally political education. According to the publication by Terrorism Research (2011), the term can be defined as the use of force against people or property done majorly to intimidate, coerce or ransom the target.
Oct 22, 2017. Editor's Note Among the many terrifying forms of violence ISIS and other terrorist groups are using, one of the newest, and deadliest, is the use of cars and trucks to run down innocent people. So far, governments have struggled in vain to stop this type of attack. Robin Simcox of the Heritage Foundation. This content was written by a student and assessed as part of a university degree. In 1956 political theorist and philosopher Walter Gallie delivered a paper to the Aristotelian Society in which he coined the term “essentially contested concept.” In Gallie’s words, these are “concepts the proper use of which inevitably involves endless disputes about their proper uses on the part of their users.” Fellow philosopher John Gray built upon Gallie’s conceptual definition, adding that disputes on such contested concepts “cannot be settled by appeal to empirical evidence, linguistic usage, or the canons of logic alone.” One can see from the development of Terrorism Studies over the last four decades that the term terrorism itself undoubtedly fits the framework of Gallie’s “essentially contested concept.” Alex Schmid and Albert Jongman’s Political Terrorism, for example, offers over 100 differing definitions given by surveyed experts when asked to define the term. In their words, “authors have spilled almost as much ink (trying to define the concept) as the actors of terrorism have spilled blood.” Despite subscribing to the belief that terrorism is indeed an “essentially contested concept”, destined to be subject to reformulation and argument, my definition of terrorism coincides with that of Christopher Mitchell et al.: In sum, terrorism by the state (or non-state actors) involves deliberate coercion and violence (or the threat thereof) directed at some victim, with the intention of inducing extreme fear in some target observers who identify with that victim in such a way that they perceive themselves as potential future victims. E-IR publishes student essays & dissertations to allow our readers to broaden their understanding of what is possible when answering similar questions in their own studies. In this way, they are forced to consider altering their behavior in some manner desired by the actor.” This characterisation makes it clear that terrorism is a strategy, not an ideology, psychology, or mind set, and it is the burden of this paper to justify my chosen definition. I will do this by deconstructing the definition in to its individual components, analyzing them, and offering supportive evidence and examples to strengthen its credibility. The four main focuses of this essay will be: 1) Why do we need to define terrorism? ; 2) States and non-state actors as perpetrators of terrorism; 3) Target-victim differentiation and the spread of terror amongst a wider population; 4) Objectives and the desire of terrorism to alter behaviour. First, we must decipher whether a definition is required. It may be argued that agreeing upon a definition is an exercise in futility: we would like to develop one, but do we actually need one? Is striving to define the term a “hopeless undertaking”, as Laqueur suggests? It is the belief of this author that a definition is indeed needed, if not wholly agreed upon, not only to allow for clearer debate amongst the social sciences, but also to protect victims of terrorism under international law, where the term terrorism is yet to be defined definitively.
Terrorism poses important political and diplomatic challenges. It is designed to call attention, through the use of violence, to the causes espoused by terrorists, and to bring about changes in policy favorable to those causes. The United States and its allies--and all other affected nations--must deal with this threat to civilized. Solutions Terrorism Essay Federal Spending Budget And Debt About Essay Example Personal Essay Examples High School The essay introduction about life my life story essay introduction essay patrick harter my life story essay. Essay global war against terrorism Assignment Writing Service blade runner essay blade runner essay gxart blade runner essay blade runner essay gxart orgfrankenstein blade Cyber Terrorism Dissertation. essay terrorism essay on paper essay about terrorism professional Child Poverty Essay Definition Happiness Essay Essay On Family a fraught narrative complicating the ldquo war on terror rdquo bethel at post cartoon. Essay on the History of the Terrorist Group ISIS Blog Ultius American Vending Surgical treatment of isthmic spondylolisthesis aims to reduce decompress nerve compression and stabilize the spine stop the slip .
U. S. Interest in Yemen and its Influence to Stop Terrorism Essay - Yemen, a Middle Eastern country is located in the Southern Arabian Peninsula in an area what is known as the Horn of Africa. Like most Middle Eastern countries, it is a country that is rich in vast cultural beliefs but also facing many hardships. It is also one of. In the years since 9/11, the response to acts of terror has been disproportionately strong in the United States. After Boston, President Obama took pains to remain calm, breaking with a deplorable tradition. The more routine our response to these crimes, the weaker they become. Jahrgang 1965, bereist als Reporter des SPIEGEL seit 2001 die Welt und hat aus vielen Krisengebieten berichtet. Berlin, Paris, New York und Hamburg waren seine Dienstsitze, zwei Jahre lang leitete er das Gesellschaftsressort.
Terrorism Essay. Terrorism is the unlawful act done by group of people by the unofficial or unauthorized use of violence to directly create terror and fear among common people for achieving their targets including personal, social, religious, political, and ideological aims. MANILA WAS IN pitch darkness and gangs of soldiers roamed the streets arresting anyone who was foolish enough to be out without a good excuse. A gun was thrust into the airport taxi I was travelling in but was quickly withdrawn when my driver explained I was a foreigner with an introduction to meet a high-ranking Filipino police officer. It was 1973 and the new Australian attorney-general, Lionel Murphy, had asked me to report on how police dealt with organised crime in South-East Asia. I arrived a few days after President Marcos declared martial law. The next day I met the police general with whom I was scheduled to have discussions. He greeted me warmly and offered me a cigar and a whisky even though it was only 10 in the morning. The general was a squat, tough-looking man with a metre of medals pinned to his chest and had no hesitation in answering my question about the rationale for martial law. He said it was essential to neutralise the current crop of communist terrorists and other insurgents. "We did it before and we will do it again," he told me, and explained how the national government had brutally crushed communist guerillas terrorising most of Luzon just after World War II, proudly pointing to the medals he won during the campaign. If the New People's Army (NPA), an offshoot of the remnants of the guerillas, was to be eliminated then martial law, detention without trial and even the political assassination of NPA leaders would all be used with a vengeance, he proudly proclaimed.
Feb 10, 2001. The following three essays discuss the causes and cures for terrorism. They were written at. In all three essays, I highlight tempting courses of action that not only won't work but which would make things. price of peace to stopping the terrorists, which ordinary Palestinians have no way of doing. And the. Poor man’s bombs are the biological weapons that even the terrorists with limited skills and resources can make this kind of weapon. In the process of making this weapon, there will be no much difficulty involved and the process is not complex and not expensive. In making a biological weapons there is no need for large facilities. disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. Biological weapons are made in the use of any pathogen su... Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants, they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man. States from Michigan to Nebraska to California, as well as the federal government, are considering new rules on letting law-abiding citizens carry guns. Does allowing citizens to carry concealed handguns deter violent crimes? Or does this cause otherwise law-abiding citizens to harm each other? Thirty-one states now have guaranteed their citizens the right to carry concealed handguns if... Gun Control Gun control is an action of the government that is supposed to reduce crime.
Mar 9, 2018. White paper on essay for a free agent does professional hockey, which endured labor stop and focus more, you have been near the computer d discussion between the writer s use of prescribed texts for cultural diversity. Bargielachiappini, f. Face and politeness in language teacher in a. Terrorism keeps on representing a main danger to global peace and security and weakens the basic ideals of the United Nations. As well as the dreadful human expense of terrorism, regarding lives lost or perpetually modified, terrorist acts intend to subvert governments and weaken financial and social increase. Terrorist acts regularly oppose national confines; one action of terrorism can include deeds and performers from various nations. Given this unpredictability, solid coordination and participation inside of federal governments and among states and associations at the local and universal level is vital to adequately battle terrorism. Recognize the persons well liable to be drawn into terrorism. Names might reveal possible victims, so pay special mind to any individual who has as of late changed a name. Obviously, your intended interest group could be utilizing assumed names. What's more, bear in mind that the obligation to avoid terrorism likewise grasps 'the white supremacist philosophy of thrilling conservative sets'.
The Challenge of Terror A Traveling Essay. by John Paul. We should be careful to pursue one and only one thing as the strategic guidepost of our response Avoid doing what they expect. What they. It will not stop with the use of military force, in fact, open warfare will create the soils in which it is fed and grows. Military. Each topic question is followed by the type of claim statement it makes which can help you find a topic if your assignment is to write a particular kind of essay. All of the claim types are useful for "Argument," "Position," or "Expository" essays. In the back of this book is a list of suggested issues and articles related to those issues. Usually, these articles are just a start for looking for a topic. You can take an idea from the article you like and then research it to find out what different people think about that issue. Try looking up an issue you are interested in on You Tube. You might get some good ideas just browsing around.
Nov 11, 2004. This essay is made available, with her permission, as a contribution to a Serendip on-line forum discussion of "The Place of the US in the World Community, November. It is possible for the victims to stop the cycle of terrorism in its tracks without committing any violence to anyone, including themselves. Sitting on a crudely crafted set, appears nine times a week on 173 television stations across the nation, parroting Trump administration talking points and defending the president. In one commentary, he fended off criticism of Trump’s remarks following the violence in Charlottesville, Virginia, on August 12. That chain of events, you’ll recall, was the handiwork of neo-Nazis and self-described white nationalists who had come to town ostensibly to protest the planned removal from a public park of a statue of Confederate General Robert E. Dozens were injured in the melee, and one anti-racism protester, Heather Heyer, was killed when a man associated with white supremacists plowed his car into her group of marchers. The president went out of his way to say that there were bad and violent people “on both sides.” People on the left, the pundit opined, were outraged that “the president, correctly, acknowledged that there was hate and violence coming from the left, as well.” Lacking any hard evidence that equivalent attacks from left protesters played any role in the Charlottesville melee, the Trump lackey shifted the narrative to a June shooting in which a lone gunman targeted Republicans practicing for a congressional baseball game. “Representative Steve Scalise and three others, shot on a baseball field in Alexandria, Virginia, have the bullet wounds to prove that there’s plenty of hate and violence from the left,” the commentator said. He did not mention that Democratic leaders had condemned the baseball-field shooting. Nor did he veer anywhere near the most disturbing of Trump’s Charlottesville comments: the president’s assertion that some “very fine people” had taken part in a march in Charlottesville the night before, when white nationalists descended on the campus of the University of Virginia, bearing torches and chanting a Nazi slogan. It was easy for left-leaning activists and plugged-in liberal types to dismiss such self-serving right-wing outbursts as but lazy and rote extensions of the Fox News model of morally bankrupt what-aboutism.
Apr 3, 2016. No matter what promises are made on the campaign trail, terrorism will never be vanquished. There is no ideology, no surveillance, no wall that will definitely stop some 24-year-old from becoming radicalized on the Web, gaining access to guns and shooting a soft target. When we don't admit this to. In the wake of the barbaric Paris terror attack, everyone is debating how to stop further terrorism. But – despite what the talking heads may say – the methods for stopping future attacks are well known … Saudi Arabia is the world’s largest sponsor of radical Islamic terrorists. Some say we need more war against Islamic countries … The Saudis have backed ISIS and many other brutal terrorist groups. has been supporting the Saudis militarily, with NSA intelligence and in every other way possible for 70 years. If we want to stop creating new terrorists, we have to stop torturing … Top CIA officers say that increase terrorism (and see this). According to sworn declarations from a 9/11 Commissioner and the Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry Into 9/11, the Saudi government backed the 9/11 hijackers (see section VII for details). support – back the radical “madrassas” in which Islamic radicalism was spread. In addition, top American terrorism experts say that U. support for brutal and tyrannical countries in the Middle east – like Saudi Arabia – is one of the We’re arming the most violent terrorists in the Middle East, as part of a geopolitical strategy to overthrow leaders we don’t like (see section III for more details). Previously-leaked documents showed that the CIA for cynical political gain. And – strangely – we’re overthrowing the more moderate Arabs who stabilized the region and denied jihadis a foothold. has undertaken regime change against Arab leaders we don’t like for six decades. If we want to stop terrorism, we have to stop overthrowing Arab leaders and invading Arab countries to grab their oil. Once again, we have a very current example: Paris terrorist Cherif Kouchi told a court in 2005 that he wasn’t radical until he learned about U. The CIA – the agency in charge of drone strikes – even told Obama that drone kills can increase terrorism. Saudi Arabia is the hotbed of the most radical Muslim terrorists in the world: the Salafis (both ISIS and Al Qaeda are Salafis). Indeed, the French terrorists who just murdered the cartoonists in Paris apparently just returned from waging war against the Syrian government, where they may – directly or indirectly – have obtained U. If we want to stop terrorism, we need to stop supporting the terrorists. We overthrew the leader of Syria in 1949, Iran in 1953, Iraq , Turkey, Libya … Neoconservatives planned regime change throughout the Middle East and North Africa yet again in 1991. as a “small price to pay for being a superpower“: A senior officer on the Joint Staff told State Department counter-terrorism director Sheehan he had heard terrorist strikes characterized more than once by colleagues as a “small price to pay for being a superpower”. See this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this. Feldman – former professor of decision analysis and economics at the Air Force Institute of Technology and the School of Advanced Airpower Studies – and other experts say that foreign occupation is the of terrorism. Pape – who specializes in international security affairs – agrees. Top security experts agree that mass surveillance makes us MORE vulnerable to terrorists. If we want to stop creating new terrorists, we have to stop the drone strikes. Top American politicians admit that the Iraq oil was about oil, not stopping terrorism (documents from Britain show the same thing). We’ve fought the longest and most expensive wars in American history … Top terrorism and interrogation experts agree that torture creates terrorists. Government officials agree that 9/11 was state-sponsored terrorism … Because 9/11 was the largest terror attack on the U. in history – and all of our national security strategies are based on 9/11 – we can’t stop terror until we get to the bottom of what really happened, and which state was behind it.
Mar 23, 2015. MEASURES TO DEFEAT TERRORISM. In this paper I will discuss measures that can be taken to help prevent terrorism. Though some measures may be seen as extreme, it is often necessary to take drastic steps to keep a country or even the world safe from terrorism. I will also discuss areas in which. In the United States a common definition of terrorism is the systematic or threatened use of violence in order to intimidate a population or government and thereby effect political, religious, or ideological change. This article serves as a list and compilation of acts of terrorism, attempts of terrorism, and other such items pertaining to terrorist activities within the domestic borders of the United States by non-state actors or spies acting in the interests of or persons acting without approval of state actors. According to a report based on Justice Department figures released by the U. government January 2018, about three out of four people convicted on charges of international terrorism between September 11, 2001 to December 31, 2016, were foreign-born. According to the Justice Department, 549 were convicted for international terrorism including 254 who were citizens of another country, 148 were naturalized citizens and 148 were natural-born-citizens. Gnadenhutten massacre – Pennsylvania militia round up and executed 96 unarmed pacifist Christian Delaware (Lenape) Indians, including 69 women and children, as revenge for raids against settlers (carried out by other Indians) as well as in expression of general animosity towards all Native Americans. Big Bottom massacre – In an attempt to drive settlers out of their land (and possibly in some part driven by the earlier Gnadenhutten massacre of Lenape Indians), Lenape and Wyandot warriors went into a settlement of 36 White settlers on unclaimed land and killed 12 of them. Hillabee massacre – A day after the Hillabee Creeks had sued for peace, which was then granted by General Andrew Jackson, General William Cocke attacked and destroyed the Creek villages of Little Oakfusky and Genalga and then the main town of Hillabee. Thinking they were at peace, the Indians were unprepared and gave little resistance. Chehaw Affair – During the First Seminole War, Captain Obed Wright and a band of volunteer Georgia militiamen, angered by recent attacks from the Phelemmes and the Hoppones, took out their anger on the friendly village of Chehaw, despite the insistence of the local fort commander that the people were peaceful.
Preventing Terrorism Essay. 2133 Words 9 Pages. Show More. Winston Churchill once said, “Let our advance worrying become advance thinking and planning.” So as a nation, the conflicts we now find ourselves engaged in requires the innovative development of strategies, which go beyond our past conventional thought. Threats constantly change, yet our political discourse suggests that our vulnerabilities are simply for lack of resources, commitment or competence. But mostly we are vulnerable because we choose to be; because we've accepted, at least implicitly, that some risk is tolerable. A state that could stop every suicide bomber wouldn't be a free or, let's face it, fun one. We will simply never get to maximum defensive posture. Regardless of political affiliation, Americans wouldn't tolerate the delay or intrusion of an urban mass-transit system that required bag checks and pat-downs. After the 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, many wondered how to make the race safe the next year.
Environmental pollution, terrorism, and many other global threats do not stop at borders. We all bear global responsibility and thus need a global identity to enable us to cope with them. We must learn to integrate different levels of identity in ourselves. What matters is not either/or, but both/and. Klaus Schwab · Borders, Other. Editor’s Note: Among the many terrifying forms of violence ISIS and other terrorist groups are using, one of the newest, and deadliest, is the use of cars and trucks to run down innocent people. So far, governments have struggled in vain to stop this type of attack. Robin Simcox of the Heritage Foundation analyses the threat and identifies a range of policies that can make it less deadly. *** It has been two months since Younes Abouyaaqoub rammed a van into a crowd of shoppers in Barcelona’s Las Ramblas tourist area. Hours later, five members of the same terrorist cell drove a car into a crowd of pedestrians in the nearby town of Cambrils. The Spanish attacks mark a trend that is increasingly common in Europe: Islamist terrorists carrying out attacks by acquiring a truck, van, or car and turning it into a weapon.
This essay critically examines community-‐based approaches to counter-‐terrorism and counter-‐ radicalisation and. their increased prominence after the terrorist attacks in London in 2005, the essay will then assess. agenda-‐setting” as well as policing in order to prevent young people from subscribing to the ideas of. Disclaimer: This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. You can view samples of our professional work here. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays. MEASURES TO DEFEAT TERRORISM In this paper I will discuss measures that can be taken to help prevent terrorism.
Mar 23, 2015. To stop any such unsocial activities the whole country has to protest together & put an end to TERRORISM. 6. By eradicating the differences of castes, creeds, community, reservations, unemployment etc. from the society and by educating the youth about the self esteem, self-reliance, self-motivation. Terrorism is not just a phrase but belief that faced this world a lot. Many nations of all countries around the world are facing this risk in their areas. Essential factor is that all nations are trying to reverse it but terrorism is increasing day by day. Pakistan is one of such counties who are also suffering from this terrorism. Actually, it is struggling very much than any other country. It is only because we have a very long border, which is associated with big the countries around the world like Iran, Afghanistan, India, and China. Pakistan has sacrificed many precious lives of his country in this war against terrorism in shape of soldier, and innocent people. Thousands of Pakistanis have been sacrificed their innocent lives but they are facing it by courage.
Mar 23, 2015. In response to 9/11, then newly elected US President George W. Bush and his administration pledged to avenge the attacks and prevent others by bringing about a war on terrorism. Bush warned that those countries refusing to join their fight or those continuing to allow terrorist cells to reside in their country. Disclaimer: This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers. You can view samples of our professional work here. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays. Terrorism has inflicted fear and panic on almost every corner of the globe.
Mar 23, 2015. While each have its advantages in zeroing in on terrorists and preventing the further loss of life, certain democratic rights and ethical issues make such measures precarious and difficult. This is because any effort to weed out terrorism must be balanced against international norms on human rights and. The terrorist threat is now considered to be an everyday hazard. The risk of death caused by terrorists has become an integral component. Such a phenomenon was never as acute as now when it reached an extremely high level of risk in recent years. The practice of terror from year to year is becoming more sophisticated and cynical. In the last century, the main forms of attacks were hostage taking and explosion in a public place.
Apr 24, 2013. Dean Obeidallah is Muslim and hates terrorism, which is murder and has nothing to do with Islam. He says terrorists do not. But here's the brutal truth Neither law enforcement nor the American Muslim community can stop every radical or criminal who happens to be Muslim. A "lone wolf" can devise his or. Introduction Can terrorism ever be stopped Terrorism may be well considered one of the most controversial topics today. Since the turn of the century, the postmodern world has seen increasing levels of political, cultural, military and socio-economic disruption, much of these due to a series of terrorist attacks. Terrorism is defined as two styles,the old-style and the new-style. Old-style terrorism is most often associated with nations without states. New-style terrorism draws on globalization and differs from old-style terrorism in its scope,organization structure and means.(Giddens)Before attending in such a discussion one must first consider terrorism as an act of widespread violence, whether on the part of a state or individual, against another state or society, with the ultimate goal of forcing the latter party to give up the formers demands."Terrorist acts constitute an attack equally upon the individual separately considered; the society in which he lives; the state which he belongs; and the international community if which he forms part. Feary; Los Angeles California, 1976)With such a definition we find that terrorism is unacceptable in majority of occurrences,but we cannot be sure that is the case for a few but highly controversial situations. Middle for example, suggests that there are at least four categories of motivation among terrorists: (1) the opportunity for action, (2) the need to belong, (3) the desire for social status, and (4) the acquisition of material reward. It is desire for revenge to alter a wrong of injustice inflicted on another. The Holy Bible (New Testament,) Gideons Press; 1999. For example, From the attacks on New York City in 2001 to the spate of car bombings in Moscow to the insurrections of the Southern Philippines,almost all the attacks caused a great number of innocent death. Homer A, Jack." Hostages, Hi jacking and the Security Council;" New York, America Press,1998. It is not difficult to imagine that "one of the strongest motivations behind terrorism is vengeance, particularly the desire to avenge not oneself but others. Vengeance can be specific or diffuse, but it is an obsessive drive that is a powerful motive for violence toward others, especially people thought to be responsible for injustices" (Crenshaw, 1992). There is, first of all a fascination on the media publicizing this so much.